Arts & Photography
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Entertainment
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Law
Literature & Fiction
Medicine
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel



Antiques
Art
Autos
Baby
Books
Camera & Photo
Cleaning Supplies
Clothing
Computers
Computer & Video Games
Collectibles
DVD
Education
Electronics
Entertainment
Health & Fitness
Jewelry
Kids
Kitchen & Housewares
Magazines
Motorcycle gear
Music
Pets
Outdoor Living
Software
Sports
Tools & Hardware
Toys & Games
Video

Best Webhosts
Webmaster Tips


Shopping Mall
Health & Fitness
Electronics Toys & Games

Chevron as a voting rule.: An article from: Yale Law Journal Books
In association with Amazon.com
 Find great shopping deals on Chevron as a voting rule.: An article from: Yale Law Journal!   

 
 
 


Amazon.com's Price: $9.95
Prices subject to change.



Availability: Available for download now

Buy Now!


Binding: Digital
Format: HTML
Label: Thomson Gale
Manufacturer: Thomson Gale
Number Of Pages: 82
Publication Date: January 01, 2007
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Release Date: February 20, 2007
Studio: Thomson Gale






Editorial Review:

Product Description:
This digital document is an article from Yale Law Journal, published by Thomson Gale on January 1, 2007. The length of the article is 24440 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the author: In Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., the Supreme Court created a new framework for judicial deference to agency interpretations of law: courts should defer to an agency interpretation unless the relevant statute is clear or the agency interpretation is unreasonable. In the past two decades, however, the doctrinal Chevron framework has come under increasing strain. We suggest an alternative, which is to cast Chevron as a judicial voting rule, thereby institutionalizing deference to administrative agencies. Our thesis is that a voting rule of this sort would capture the benefits of the doctrinal version of Chevron while generating fewer costs. The principal advantage of institutionalizing Chevron as a voting rule is that it makes agency deference an aggregate property that arises from a set of votes, rather than an internal component of the decision rules used by individual judges. A voting-rule version of Chevron would also allow more precise calibration of the level of judicial deference over time, and holding the level of deference constant, a voting rule would produce less variance in deference across courts and over time, yielding a lower level of legal uncertainty than does the doctrinal version of Chevron. We consider and respond to various objections.

Citation Details
Title: Chevron as a voting rule.
Author: Jacob E. Gersen
Publication: Yale Law Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2007
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 116 Issue: 4 Page: 676(56)

Distributed by Thomson Gale









 

New - Buy Groceries

Magazine Subscriptions

Search for Posters



Health & Personal Care

This site is Hosted by Bluehost

Read my Bluehost Review