|
|
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Binding: DVD EAN: 5014138300517 Format: PAL Languages: Number Of Discs: 1 Region Code: 2 Theatrical Release Date: January 01, 1978 Editorial Review: Amazon.com: What it lacks in grandeur, this 1978 TV version of The Four Feathers makes up for in fidelity to A.E.W. Mason's classic novel. By cannibalizing the superior 1939 production for epic shots and sequences, this modest adaptation draws attention to its meager production values, relying heavily on casting and chemistry to compensate. That it succeeds, more or less, in capturing the essence of Mason's grand adventure is largely due to the appeal of Beau Bridges and Jane Seymour in the prime of their early careers. (Bridges's film career was gaining momentum; Seymour would rise from here to the similarly romantic Somewhere in Time.) Bridges is the shamed soldier Harry Faversham, transcending cowardice by rescuing his closest friends during Britain's bloody campaign in 1870s Sudan; Seymour is his beloved back home, torn between Harry and the seemingly braver Jack (Robert Powell). TV veteran Don Sharp provides tepid direction, while screenwriter Gerald DiPego would continue his prolific career for decades to come. --Jeff Shannon Average Rating:
 Rating: - An excellent movie, not so excellent battle sequencesThis version of "The four feathers" is excellent, the story is much deeper than the newest version (starring Heath Ledger). Other reviewers have told you what the story is about, so I won't go into that. This movie has an excellent cast including the following: Beau Bridges, Jane Seymour, and Robert Powell. All of the actors do an excellent job at making you believe that they are who they are. The battle sequences leave more than a little to be desired, but they are excellent ... Read More Rating:  - A bit to PredictableThe story line was interesting and intriquing at first but than it became to predictable. It also seems a bit far fetched that each man that gave him the white feathers, for what they took as pure cowardice, were all in such dire needs of rescue. How could he be there at the exact time they were in need and be the only one who could take over the feat of saving them from their eventual demise. The ending was to much of a predictablility. If I were the man, even if I am a woman, I don't think I would ... Read More Rating: - Better in some ways than the 1939 VersionFirst let me say that this movie DOES NOT use footage from the original. This is a rumor that has been spread for some reason and it is incorrect ... It does depict the fuzzy wuzzies in a very realistic light and their assault on the british square is quite good. They really look the part and they are actually bounding which as any good reader of kipling knows they did quite well,, "The Bounding Beggars!" Their hair really fits their nick name to ;) Rating: - simple is betterAlthough this modest TV movie lacks the big budget and huge numbers that make up the 2002 cinematic version of the A.E.W. Mason novel, it is nonetheless superior in terms of casting and storytelling. The strength of the casting is self-explanatory. As for the storytelling, it is more straightforward and stays closer to the focus of the novel - a young man trying to prove his courage to others after evading the call of duty. Whereas the recent theatrical adaptation goes off into tangents, such as showing ... Read More Rating: - Good treatment of the AEW Mason bookThis remake of the 1930s version of The Four Feathers remedies some of the deficiencies of the first film. Harry Faversham is a young officer tired of the military, having grown up in the army - his father is a general. He is engaged to a woman who is also of the army, but more inclined to accept it. This then is the basis of the story. Two people, similar backgrounds, different goals. He wants his children to grow up without the Army, she is impressed with a regimental wedding. War breaks ... Read More |
![: The Four Feathers [Region 2]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51V5TZC6JHL._SL160_.jpg)